Does the United States dare to answer these 9 questions?

Does the United States dare to answer these 9 questions?

Fort Detrick base (photo source: US media) Fort Detrick base (photo source: US media)

　　 1. What is the reason for the closure of Fort Detrick base?

　　 In July 2019, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ordered the emergency closure of the Fort Detrick Base of the US Army's Biosecurity Level 4 Laboratory and suspend its "research on highly pathogenic pathogens." Almost at the same time, an unexplained respiratory disease broke out in a retiree community one hour away from the base. Thousands of cases of "e-cigarette pneumonia" with symptoms very similar to the new coronary pneumonia were reported in many states across the United States. What is the relationship between Fort Detrick Base and unknown diseases and "e-cigarette pneumonia"? Why is the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention still vague on the grounds of "national security" and refuses to announce the reasons for the closure of the base? What's the hidden secret behind this?

　　2. What exactly did the more than 200 biological laboratories deployed by the United States in the world have done?

　　 Currently, the United States has deployed more than 200 military biological laboratories in 25 countries and regions including Ukraine and Afghanistan. "USA Today" investigations show that since 2003, there have been hundreds of "accidents of accidental human contact with fatal microorganisms" in related laboratories, resulting in direct contact with deadly viruses and epidemics in the community. In 2020, Ukrainian lawmakers issued a statement stating that after 15 US military biological laboratories were opened in Uzbekistan, a variety of infectious diseases broke out in the country. An epidemiologist from the Harvard School of Public Health stated publicly: "If 10 American biological laboratories conduct related experiments for 10 years, there is a 20% probability that laboratory staff will be infected with the virus and pass it to others." These more than 200 What exactly did an overseas biological laboratory in the United States do? Why not dare to accept international verification? The United States is the only country that prevents the Biological Weapons Convention from establishing a verification mechanism. What is it worrying about?

Researchers in the U.S. Army's biological laboratory work in protective clothing. Source: Associated Press US Army Biological Laboratory researchers wearing protective clothing. Source: Associated Press

　　 3. Epidemic exercises and the spread of the epidemic are highly coincident, is it a coincidence or is there another "script"?

　　 From January to August 2019, the U.S. Department of Health carried out the Crimson Contagion (Crimson Contagion) epidemic exercise. The exercise took "the respiratory virus that started in China spread to all over the world" as a simulated background. In the end, "110 million Americans were infected and 580,000 died." In October 2019, a number of organizations in the United States carried out "Event201" high-level pandemic exercises to simulate the global outbreak of the "new zoonotic coronavirus". The virus is very similar to SARS, but it is more likely to spread until Only an effective vaccine can be controlled. Is it a coincidence that the U.S. exercise settings are so consistent with reality? Is it a coincidence or "holding the script" at the beginning?

　　 4. How many "flu patients" in the United States are infected with new coronary pneumonia?

　　 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention researchers tested more than 7,000 blood samples collected from 9 states in the United States from December 13, 2019 to January 17, 2020, 106 of which contained antibodies to the new coronavirus. The National Institutes of Health collected 24,000 blood samples from multiple locations across the United States at the beginning of 2020, and at least 9 of them were tested for new coronavirus antibodies. This proves that as early as December 2019, the new coronavirus has spread in the United States at a low rate. Redfield, the former director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, publicly admitted that some of the deaths in the US flu season that began in September 2019 were actually infected with new coronary pneumonia. When will the new coronavirus appear in the United States? How many people infected with the new coronavirus have been diagnosed as "flu patients"?

Studies have shown that the new coronavirus spread at a low rate in the United States in December 2019. Source: Research by the National Institutes of Health of the United States shows that the new coronavirus spread at a low rate in the United States in December 2019. Source: National Institutes of Health

　　 5. Who was the first name of the Wuhan Virus Institute who went to the hospital in November 2019 as reported by the US media?

On May 23, the Wall Street Journal quoted an “intelligence agency report” as saying that in November 2019, three researchers from Wuhan Institute of Virology went to the hospital due to physical discomfort. The virus is "leaked from the laboratory." However, after the Chinese side proposed to publish the names of medical personnel, the US side repeatedly refused to respond. Since the US claims that the intelligence is "reliable," why hasn't it announced the last names of the three? What are you worrying about?

　　6. The United States claims that it will start developing a new crown vaccine on January 11, 2020. Where did the strain come from?

　　 Former U.S. President Trump has publicly stated that the United States will begin developing a new crown vaccine on January 11, 2020. On March 16, 2020, the National Institutes of Health stated that Moderna Inc.'s (Moderna Inc.) experimental vaccine against the new coronavirus has carried out the first human test. Experts commented that the injection in the United States was too fast, "unless the test is started very early and the strain is obtained earlier." In February of this year, the US news website Gateway Pundit exposed a non-disclosure agreement jointly signed by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and Modena. The agreement shows that in December 2019, the "mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidate" developed by the two parties was officially transferred to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Why did the United States start developing vaccines so early? How did you get the strain?

The new crown vaccine developed by Modena (Source: Associated Press) The new crown vaccine developed by Modena (Source: Associated Press)

　　7. Why does the United States have to ban virus scientists?

　　 Beginning in February 2020, the White House requires government health officials and scientists to obtain approval from the Office of the Vice President of the United States before they can publicly express their views on the epidemic. Starting from March 2020, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has stopped publishing important data such as the number of people tested and the number of confirmed cases on the grounds of "inaccurate data." Chinese American female doctor Zhu Hailun was ordered to shut down by the US authorities for warning about the epidemic; Christian Anderson, a California virologist, was forced to close his Twitter account for analyzing the origin of the new crown virus; since the outbreak began, he has repeatedly shared scientific resistance. Anthony Fauci, an infectious disease expert who has knowledge of the epidemic and refutes the anti-commonsense arguments of US politicians, has been threatened to "fire" by the White House social accounts and has been repeatedly suppressed. Why does the United States, known as free speech, have to ban virus scientists? What are you afraid of leaking?

　　 8. Why has the United States repeatedly ignored the research results of virus traceability in the world's scientific community?

　　 In March this year, the WHO released a joint research report on the global traceability of the new coronavirus (China part), which clearly stated that the leak of the new coronavirus from the laboratory is "Extremely Unlikely". On July 5, 24 internationally renowned medical experts stated in an article in The Lancet, “There is currently no scientific evidence to support the'Chinese laboratory leak statement' of the new coronavirus. Recent peer-reviewed studies strongly indicate that the new coronavirus has evolved in nature. "On July 7, scientists from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and other countries published a preprinted paper on the open scientific data platform Zenodo, stating that "there is currently no evidence that any early COVID-19 cases have any connection with Wuhan virus research." Against this background, why does the United States still insist on hyping "the virus originates from a Chinese laboratory" and launching the "second stage virus traceability"? Who is politicizing the source of the virus?

24 internationally renowned medical experts jointly published articles in The Lancet. Source: 24 internationally renowned medical experts on the "Lancet" website jointly published articles in "The Lancet". Source: "The Lancet" website

　　9. The United States has "doubled its investigation" into the origin of the new crown virus. Why did the intelligence agencies execute it?

　　 In May of this year, the White House ordered the U.S. intelligence services to conduct a "double investigation" on the origin of the new crown virus, requesting that the findings be submitted within 90 days. According to the New York Times, former U.S. Secretary of State Pompeo and former Deputy National Security Affairs Assistant Pottinger have repeatedly pressured the CIA, National Security Agency, National Defense Intelligence Agency and other agencies to search for "the new crown virus comes from the Chinese experiment. Room evidence". Recently, the staff of the Hudson Institute in the United States suggested that they spend between 10 million and 15 million U.S. dollars to lure the staff of the Wuhan Institute of Virology to "tell the truth." Why did the United States completely ignore the scientific seriousness of virus traceability and let intelligence agencies intervene in the lead? Even if such an "investigation report" is released, how reliable can it be?

　　 America, please answer!

　　 Finishing/Dian Cang Jushi